Spent the past several months
reviewing and updating the
curriculum for NTID students
— an arduous yet vital task.
Passionate and enthusiastic
about her work.
You were nominated because of your contributions
in redoing the NTID curriculum.
Can you tell us a little about this?
I was given the responsibility to work with a
group of 11 department chairs and our full
[NTID] faculty...I think the important point
there is that I didn’t do this myself. This was
the result of three years of intensive work by
the faculty within the college.
First of all, we established some enrollment
goals for ourselves in terms of where we thought
our deaf and hard of hearing students would be
enrolled in 2010. We wanted to move to three
different career program paths. The first would
be career-focused associate degrees. We had always
offered career-focused associate degrees;
that’s not new, but we wanted to consolidate
some programs.
The second part of it is a new initiative to develop
transfer associate degrees. “2+2 or 2+3” is
what we’re calling it, and the idea behind these
degrees is that we wanted students to be able
to have an experience with us as a college that
would directly lead the student into a degree
with one of the other seven colleges at RIT. 80%
of the credits that the students get in the two-year
degree are transferred directly into the
program at the accompanying RIT college.
We also, in the last three years at NTID, developed
a four-year bachelor’s program in ASL and
English Interpretation. That program was approved
last year and we just offered it this past
fall for the first time. We also offer a teacher
education graduate program. It’s a master’s of
science in secondary education for teachers of
the deaf.
The last pathway — again, it’s not a new program
— is the baccalaureate program and the
grad degrees for deaf and hard of hearing students.
What we’re trying to do there is to have
about 45 percent of all the deaf and hard of
hearing students on this campus be in baccalaureate
programs or graduate programs. Right
now we’re at about 43 percent, so we’re trying
to increase that number.
The other thing that we did was... consolidate
the support departments with our technical
or our associate degree faculty departments
so that we now have one department. That department
is now responsible for working with
students across the continuum.
It seems that you combined a lot of
things that were separate beforehand.
What kind of response has that gotten?
We just finished the last consolidation this
last fall, so we haven’t had a full year yet
where we’ve had a department completely
merged. We’ve gone from 20 departments to 11.
We’re trying to make it transparent for the
students and for the other colleges. Change is
not easy and we’re changing the culture here
and we’re working through that right now.
It’s a process. I can’t tell you today that everybody’s
happy, but I think that the goal is to try
to...make sure that we’re meeting the needs of
our students.
Tell me more about the
“Communication Outcomes.”
There are three communications outcomes:
e-mail etiquette, face-to-face communication,
and presentation skills. Students are required
to take a communications course and the outcomes
are embedded in the communications
course. They are also intentionally embedded
in other courses. And then when the students
get into their last year...the communication outcomes
are measured in the capstone course.
If you had to change one thing about
how the curriculum changes went,
what do you think it would be?
If there was one thing I would change, I guess
I’ve learned how important getting the message
out is. One thing I would change would be
to have used more opportunity to have more
frequent updates for our faculty. I’d also like to
say one other thing. We’ve tried to do this major
curriculum revision at the same time that we’ve
hired 24 new full-time faculty [members]. I think
that’s not an easy thing to do because both of
those processes require care and concentration
and thoughtfulness. Sometimes I think we have
been pulled in two very important directions at
the same time.
What can we expect to come next?
We’re going to explore some additional associate
degrees. We’re going to expand the
number of students in the interpreter training
program. Next year, we’re going to have 145
students in that program. We’re always having
our antenna up to see if there’s any new career-
focused associate degrees that we should
consider offering.
Is there anything else
you’d like to say to RIT?
You can develop curriculum and you can hire
faculty, but we measure our success here by our
retention and our graduation rates, and so we
have kept that as our beacon throughout all of
this curriculum development work. If students
don’t persist here, and if we aren’t able to show
strong retention and strong graduation, this will
be for naught.